|
Enterprise Norco DCS Re-Instrumentation Project
This project won a 2001 ABC Pelican Chapter
Excellence in Construction Award and also won a Merit Award from
Louisiana Contractor Magazine.
Enterprise Products Operating Limited Partnership (EPOLP),
owner-operator of a gas fractionation plant located in Norco,
Louisiana, implemented a turnkey, lump-sum instrumentation
conversion and upgrade project, in January of 2001. Capable of
processing 60,000 barrels per day of demethanized natural gas
liquid, the Norco facility is a single-train fractionation plant
built in the late 1960s. This project completely replaced an aging
control system consisting primarily of pneumatic and single-loop
programmable logic controllers (PLCs) with a new, state-of-the-art
Honeywell Plantscape® distributed control system (DCS) and
associated field instruments – one of the first such systems in this
area.
Considerable up-front engineering was performed, including
development of a "scope book" that provided the basis for a definite
estimate. The scope book defined every aspect of the project,
allowing EPOLP to solicit lump-sum bids for an Engineer-Procure-
Construct (EPC) contract. In addition, Enterprise and ISC project
team members participated in the engineering phase, a unique
approach that allowed the project to take advantage of a number of
very beneficial constructability ideas from the very beginning.
In a competitive lump-sum bidding process, EPOLP management
unanimously selected RPM Engineering, an ISO9001-certified,
multi-disciplinary consulting and engineering firm, and Industrial
Specialty Contractors, L.L.C. to completely revamp the
instrumentation and control systems at their gas and liquids
facilities in Norco, Louisiana. This Engineer, Procure and Construct
(EPC) agreement created a unique partnership based on a high degree
of trust, skill and commitment.
Prior to installation, the new control system was set up and
tested at ISC's Baton Rouge office, a central location that
eliminated unnecessary travel expenses. This allowed the project
team to perform all required factory acceptance tests with input
from everyone on the team. In addition, this allowed operators to
train locally, which minimized work disruptions and helped resolve
configuration issues prior to installation at the site.
Construction activities were performed in an existing facility
while it continued to operate, and new equipment was put in service
"on the fly." More than 750 existing instruments and controls were
safely replaced, modified or completely rewired with 61,000 feet of
new wire and cable in more than four miles of new conduit and cable
tray.
After the factory acceptance was complete at ISC – and with
everyday operations, production and construction activities
continuing at the Norco plant – the heart of the new system was
installed and commissioned in the existing control room. All new and
existing instrumentation, control devices and associated wiring that
would ultimately control the facility were pre-commissioned in place
one by one, simulating operating conditions.
With input from all project team members, ISC developed a
detailed cutover plan containing written procedures by priority for
each individual control loop. Plant operators then began the very
difficult task of simultaneously controlling the plant with both
control systems until all cutovers were completed and safe
operations were established.
The existing control room experienced a dramatic change as hot
cutovers were performed. Existing devices that had controlled the
plant for more than 30 years were demolished, leaving gaping holes
in the huge, tempered-steel control panels surrounding the control
room.
Once the hot cutovers were completed and the plant was running
safely on the new control system, the old steel panels and concrete
foundations were completely demolished and removed, again without
disturbing plant operations.
All in all, the EPOLP Norco DCS Re-Instrumentation Project far
exceeded owner expectations, both during installation and by
comparison to industry-standard performance criteria. |